A streamlined NGO approach to drought-induced food insecurity in Zimbabwe: voices from EAP custodians and stakeholders

Acting as EAP ‘custodians’, Welthungerhilfe, Action Against Hunger and Trócaire partnered with national organizations to ensure a localized approach. These three further EAP custodians were identified through a competitive tendering progress, held among the Start Network’s member organizations. Welthungerhilfe and the TSURO Trust took responsibility for EAP development in Chimanimani; Action Against Hunger and Nutrition Action Zimbabwe for Chivi; and Trócaire and Caritas Bulawayo for Matobo.

During the EAP development process, all custodians engaged with actors at all levels: community members, community committees, and local and national governments and agencies. Research and consultations were conducted to select suitable early actions for each region. For example, communities were consulted on the impacts of past drought, their anticipated needs and potential risk factors. This was done through a range of participatory methods, including key informant interviews, focus group discussions, community visits, consultations and stakeholder workshops. All three EAP custodians followed the three steps in Welthungerhilfe’s manual, ‘Early Action Identification and EAP Development - Step-By-Step Guidance’, which are outlined below. This helped to ensure a streamlined approach and created opportunities for the custodians to exchange ideas and learn from each other.

A learning event in Chivi District, Zimbabwe

On 21 July 2022, EAP custodians held a learning event in Masvingo, Zimbabwe, hosted by Nutrition Action Zimbabwe and Action Against Hunger. They shared experiences and successes in the development of early actions for drought, evaluated the challenges faced and overcome, and shared the lessons learned and key recommendations to further strengthen future programmes. Partners and stakeholders also took the opportunity to share their own experiences of this FbA initiative.

The participants acknowledged that the standardization of the EAP development process in all three districts was beneficial for cooperation, joint implementation and learning. Additionally, they applauded the uniqueness of this approach, which is bottom-up rather than top-down, with a focus on involving all stakeholders and affected communities throughout the development steps. Involving communities so closely in the identification of early actions also had positive side effects: communities not only identified feasible activities for the EAP custodians in anticipation of drought to be financed through funding, but also actions that could be implemented by communities without external funding.

Key findings from the learning event

During district-specific groupwork at the learning event, the EAP custodians and the stakeholders present from Chivi discussed what went well, areas for improvement, opportunities, best practices, and recommendations for the future. A synopsis of these results is presented here.

What went well

• The streamlined NGO approach brought uniformity to the EAP development process across the three EAP regions.
• There were good working relationships between the EAP custodians, both within and between the EAP regions.
• Stakeholders were engaged and involved throughout.
• There was good compliance with existing structures (e.g., protocols and policies).
• Different groups in society were fully represented, for example women, youths, local leaders, persons with disability, the elderly, disaster risk reduction committees and men.
• The bottom-up approach resulted in a participatory process.
• Using an evidence-based approach led to an effective ranking of wards, and allowed for targeting and addressing each community’s needs.
• Ranking the wards helped the districts to identify those that were the most drought vulnerable.

Areas for improvement

• Increase response funding to cover all vulnerable households.
• Timing of implementation is important: the EAP implementation collided with the first impact of drought, and there is a need to be more proactive in future.
• The timeline for developing the EAP (three months) was tight.
• Longer training sessions would increase capacity building.

Opportunities and best practices

• Use a participatory process that involves stakeholders and communities (e.g., adoption of community-led disaster risk management tools) in the EAP development process.
• Encourage stakeholder and community buy-in and support for this approach.
• Align with and adhere to existing structures (e.g., government protocols, the national cash working group).
• Adopt the approach outlined in Welthungerhilfe’s step-by-step manual.
• Work together through a streamlined approach that enables cross-organizational learning.

Recommendations for the future

• Expand capacity building for FbA (e.g., training sessions).
• Avoid ‘over-researching’ communities: community awareness meetings can be combined with consultative meetings.
• Plan for exchange visits to allow for cross-custodian learning.
• Scale up in terms of ward coverage and budgets.
• Incorporate universities into the research elements.
• There is a need to develop a systematic exit strategy.
• Engage with traditional and indigenous knowledge systems (e.g., potential validations for triggers).

The drought-model trigger and EAP implementation in 2022

In the scope of this FbA initiative in Zimbabwe, the programme’s drought-monitoring tool predicted a deterioration of the climatological and agricultural situation in the coming months. Hence, negative impacts on food security are expected, especially affecting already vulnerable groups. In response, the Start Network released funding for all three pilot regions in Zimbabwe. All three EAP custodians will roll out the actions set out in their EAPs in the coming months. More information on this will follow soon.